Association between modified ankle-brachial pressure index and indices of adiposity

نویسندگان

چکیده

Objectives: Obesity is one of the important risk factors for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) a non-invasive test, which may be used earlier detection PAD. ABPI in healthy obese/overweight subjects has not been studied. In present study, we investigated correlation adiposity indices with ABPI. We have also compared by three different methods subjects. Materials and Methods: Weight, height, body mass (BMI), waist circumference, hip circumference (HC), height ratio, skin fold thickness, fat percentage were measured 45 overweight/obese males. Ankle brachial pressures Doppler ultrasound based method. was calculated using high ankle (ABPI-HIGH), mean (ABPI-MEAN), low (ABPI-LOW) methods. Results: BMI HC show positive significant ABPI-LOW ( P = 0.028, 0.046, respectively). Significant difference observed between ABPI-HIGH 0.003). ABPI-MEAN ABPILOW significantly < 0.001). Conclusion: There obesity ABPI-LOW. could more appropriate method contrastingly direct PAD apparently obese.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Association between ankle-brachial index and carotid atherosclerotic disease.

BACKGROUND The association between the ankle brachial index (ABI) and the measurement of intimal medial thickness (IMT) has not been fully studied. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate whether the prevalence of carotid atherosclerosis was higher in patients with ABI < 0.9 than in those with ABI > 0.9. METHODS From January 2011 to December 2011, 118 patients (48 men and 70 women) were enrolled. AB...

متن کامل

Association between different measurements of blood pressure variability by ABP monitoring and ankle-brachial index

BACKGROUND Blood pressure (BP) variability has been associated with cardiovascular outcomes, but there is no consensus about the more effective method to measure it by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). We evaluated the association between three different methods to estimate BP variability by ABPM and the ankle brachial index (ABI). METHODS AND RESULTS In a cross-sectional study of ...

متن کامل

Association between Systolic Blood Pressure Difference ≥10 mm Hg and Ankle-Brachial Index

Background: In new outpatients, blood pressure should be measured in both arms. A previous study reported that an inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference (ΔSBP) of ≥10 mm Hg is associated with an increased risk of mortality. Aim: The aim was to identify the associations with absolute values of ΔSBP (|ΔSBP|) ≥10 mm Hg. Subjects and Methods: This study included 2481 patients. Patients with a...

متن کامل

validity and reliability of the ankle?brachial index by oscillometric blood pressure and automated ankle?brachial index

background: this study was conducted to assess the validity and reliability of ankle?brachial index (abi) by oscillometric blood pressure (bp) measurement as compared with an automated abi as a gold standard. materials and methods: this study was conducted at golden jubilee medical center, thailand. all the data were collected from 303 patients at risk of peripheral arterial disease (pad) who w...

متن کامل

The Relationship between Abnormal Ankle-brachial Index and Micro-vascular Complications of Diabetes Type II

Background:The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is increasing worldwide and the relationship between peripheral vascular involvement and the complications of diabetes disease, such as retinopathy, has been reported in some studies but has not yet been fully proven. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between diabetes complications and peripheral and central vascular involve...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['0019-5499', '2582-2799']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25259/ijpp_206_2020